Evidence before estimate
What can be shown from the record, separated from what is inferred and what is simply missing.
Research & insights
Published work built the same way as everything else here: from the public record, with every figure carrying its evidence grade and the unresolved questions named rather than filled in. Several pieces reach a negative conclusion — that a market is smaller than it looks, or that a route does not exist. Those are published for the same reason as the rest.
Analytical research notes, not formal academic publications and not investment advice. They are written to help owners, developers, investors and policy readers think more clearly about decisions that turn on evidence. Where research has been submitted to a public consultation, it is recorded on the consultations page.
Topic 01 · 2 published
What Australian industrial operations actually consume, burn and emit — established bottom-up from filings and reconciled against independently built accounts, rather than inferred from a sector average.
The 2026–27 Safeguard review asks whether to lower the 100,000-tonne coverage threshold. Because the statutory minimum baseline moves with it, the larger effect lands on facilities already inside the scheme — and it is in no table in the consultation paper.
Read research → Industrial & Emissions · National reconciliationAustralia burns 1,269.9 PJ of diesel a year, but only about 4 per cent of it makes electricity. Sizing the replaceable market from the national energy account down to what is actually left.
Read research → Industrial & Emissions · Weak-grid mine energyThey buy operational continuity. Diesel is not just fuel — it is five roles at once — so the first question is which diesel exposure can be replaced reliably and financeably.
Read research →The facility-level evidence behind this topic is described on the platform page, and what has actually been analysed is indexed on the track record page.
Topic 02 · 3 published
Pricing, tariffs, dispatch and the market structures that decide whether an energy position is worth what a model says it is.
The locational pricing debate carries a hard lesson for remote sites. In Australia it is already here — loss factors, REZ congestion — and it makes on-site solar + BESS a hedge, not a preference.
Read research → Energy Markets · Behind-the-meter tariffsHow peak shaving works, which Australian tariff details matter, and why interval data must come before battery sizing or value stacking.
Read research → Energy Markets · Dispatch and saturationDuration, market saturation and regulatory uncertainty can turn a strong central forecast into cashflow that cannot support debt.
Read research →Topic 03 · 9 published
What has to be true before a project can advance, and what a lender, sponsor or acquirer is actually underwriting when they look at one.
Customer avoided cost is not SPV revenue. The cashflow chain a lender actually underwrites, the S1/S2/S3 cases, and why carbon value must not be counted twice.
Read research → Investment & Projects · Early screeningThe useful early output is not a beautiful IRR — it is finding where the project breaks. How the F1–F4 workflow turns uncertainty into a sharper decision.
Read research → Investment & Projects · ReadinessWhen capital is abundant, capital stops being the constraint. What utility-scale battery finance teaches industrial PV+BESS developers about what actually gets a project funded.
Read research → Investment & Projects · Time-to-powerWhat development attrition, interconnection and equipment constraints reveal about the value of discovering fatal risks early.
Read research → Investment & Projects · Development readinessWhy queued megawatts overstate deliverable supply, and how land, planning, grid, procurement and finance gates determine what gets built.
Read research → Investment & Projects · RTB completenessRTB value depends on complete, transferable and consistent land, cable, planning, grid and delivery rights — not percentage complete.
Read research → Investment & Projects · Brownfield BESSHow brownfield infrastructure can avoid years of development, and which capacity, charging and revenue constraints still need diligence.
Read research → Investment & Projects · Emerging marketsStart with who pays for flexibility, under which contract and currency, then work backwards to duration, connection, equipment and site.
Read research → Investment & Projects · Hybrid asset diligenceSolar and BESS share and compete for connection, controls and contracts. Their value must be modelled and diligenced as one system.
Read research →Worked applications of this thinking are on the projects and case studies page.
Topic 04 · 1 published
The rules that decide what an industrial operation is exposed to, what abatement earns, and which public support is actually available to it. This is the newest of the four topics and the thinnest — it is listed as it is rather than padded.
The Safeguard Mechanism analysis — the statutory baseline floor, the band in which abatement earns no credit, and how a 2029 position is established for a specific facility — currently sits on the homepage and the platform page rather than as a standalone research note. Policy engagement built on this work is recorded on the consultations page.
Visual library
Compact visual maps for discussing mining hybrid development, financial close, BESS responsibilities, remote mine architecture and industrial PV+BESS stakeholders.
In preparation
Listed so the direction is visible. Nothing here is published yet, and none of it should be cited or relied on until it is.
Themes
What can be shown from the record, separated from what is inferred and what is simply missing.
How customer savings become — or fail to become — stable, bankable revenue.
Two figures agreeing is only evidence when their inputs do not overlap.
Ownership, operator and contract control frequently sit somewhere other than where they appear to.
The practical realities of operations where diesel is backup, peak support and reliability insurance at once.
A market that is smaller than it looks is a finding, and it is published like any other.
Take it further
Most of this work started as somebody’s real question. If you are looking at one — a facility, a market, a project, a policy exposure — a short, non-confidential exchange is usually enough to establish whether it can be answered from the public record at all.