Case studies
A project screen takes a single site and asks whether it should proceed, based on approvals, site constraints, the connection arrangement and the financing case. We build it from public records and publish each figure with its source and confidence rating.
These are desktop reviews using our four-part early-stage screening method and public information. They are not commissioned advice, lender due diligence or bank-approved models. Figures and zones are indicative early-stage outputs. Nothing here is legal, financial, tax, engineering or investment advice.
The library
One project or site at a time: whether it should proceed, which site conditions constrain it, and which evidence is still missing. Screens of third-party assets are published anonymised.
A screen using public information, covering approvals, site, the microgrid boundary and the financing case.
An illustrative screen showing why a large customer saving can still fail the lender test under the current debt structure.
What you receive
A screen can produce three documents for different decisions and audiences.
For public websites, first conversations and non-confidential sharing.
For an initial discussion with the owner or sponsor.
Lists the unresolved questions, who should answer them and the evidence required.
